Relative dating and absolute dating of fossils
Researchers can first apply an absolute dating method to the layer.
They then use that absolute date to establish a relative age for fossils and artifacts in relation to that layer. Anything below the Taupo tephra is earlier than 232; anything above it is later.
Measuring carbon-14 in bones or a piece of wood provides an accurate date, but only within a limited range.
Says Shea: “Beyond 40,000 years old, the sample is so small, and the contamination risk so great, that the margin of error is thousands of years.
When it comes to determining the age of stuff scientists dig out of the ground, whether fossil or artifact, “there are good dates and bad dates and ugly dates,” says paleoanthropologist John Shea of Stony Brook University.
The good dates are confirmed using at least two different methods, ideally involving multiple independent labs for each method to cross-check results.
This includes factoring in many variables, such as the amount of radiation the object was exposed to each year.
Generally speaking, the more complex a poem or piece of pottery is, the more advanced it is and the later it falls in the chronology.
Unlike observation-based relative dating, most absolute methods require some of the find to be destroyed by heat or other means.